tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4259578163162335970.post1416499173951545569..comments2023-10-15T12:45:06.917+01:00Comments on Thinking out loud: Google docs not so good for long docs?Stu Johnsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02720483784545235595noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4259578163162335970.post-89595941767663702022011-03-24T11:48:00.000+00:002011-03-24T11:48:00.000+00:00Bookmarks work ok as internal references - see tip...Bookmarks work ok as internal references - see tip 13 here http://goo.gl/X1e5l. Although if I changed the name of the reference the heading wouldn't update but the link would still workStuart Johnsonhttp://studentdevpt.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4259578163162335970.post-75477593486000674562011-03-24T10:50:00.000+00:002011-03-24T10:50:00.000+00:00I guess the answer might be - google docs was desi...I guess the answer might be - google docs was designed for online documents, so page numbers, cross references etc are not necessary where 'screens' can resize and reflow your writing and a hyperlink is another way to link to two things... once theses go over to electronic only submission this won't matter any more (though why do a PhD if you can't get a doorstop out of it?!) ... perhaps you're just ahead of the curve Stu ;-)Jo Badgehttp://drbadgr.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4259578163162335970.post-51344902322045980892011-03-24T10:54:00.000+00:002011-03-24T10:54:00.000+00:00Ahead of the curve. Very funny ;) I think you'...Ahead of the curve. Very funny ;) I think you're right re not designed for print. Re hyperlinks - so can I cross reference within the doc using a hyperlink? E.g. 'as can be seen in Figure 2'. Trouble is without captions you'd still have to be v careful with numbering - if you inserted a new figure between 1 and 2, 2 wouldn't become 3, etc.Stuart Johnsonhttp://studentdevpt.com/noreply@blogger.com